Firm Files Cert. Reply on Behalf of DeAndre Gordon

Written By Daniel Woofter

Today, the firm filed the Cert. Reply in Gordon v. May, No. 23-629 (U.S.), urging the Supreme Court to review a question that respondent acknowledges has deeply divided the federal courts of appeals 4 to 7—whether a Certificate of Appealability must be granted such that a state prisoner may appeal the denial of his federal habeas petition when at least one circuit judge votes to grant one.

Daniel Woofter
Previous

Firm Files Rule 23(f) Petition on Behalf of Securities Fraud Plaintiff
Next

Firm Files Amicus Brief For NAPD And MACDL In Support Of Petitioner Carlos Guardado